What is NOT a tactic for resolving conflict?

Suppression is not considered a viable tactic for resolving conflict because it involves forcibly putting an end to the disagreement without addressing the underlying issues. This approach may provide a temporary solution but often leaves the root cause of the conflict unresolved, which can lead to future problems and deeper resentment. Unlike compromise, avoidance, and collaboration, which aim to address the interests of both parties involved and find mutually acceptable solutions, suppression simply sidelines the conflict.

In contrast, compromise seeks to find a middle ground where both parties make concessions. Avoidance involves steering clear of the conflict entirely, which may be appropriate in certain situations to prevent escalation. Collaboration encourages an open dialogue where all parties work together to find a solution that satisfies everyone’s needs. Each of these tactics aims to address the conflict positively, while suppression does not engage with the disagreement directly but rather suppresses it, making it ineffective for true conflict resolution.